**The Monchord**

A monochord consists of a single string stretched over a sound box, with the strings held taut by pegs or weights on either end. It was used earlier by others, but most of our current knowledge of the instrument is of its use by Pythagoras as early around the 6th century BC for scientific research on the nature of sound. The instrument is most important in Western music for its scientific research, rather then its musical qualities. Other cultures, however, such as in many parts of Africa, Brazil, and Hawaii (just to name a few) have used it as a musical instrument. Jeff Cottrell cites on the importance of the instrument in early cosmology, numerology, and music theory. “Pythagoras' study of ratios on the monochord led philosophers to believe that these ratios also governed the movement of planets and other cosmic matters (Ptolemy). This provided the bridge between the world of physical experience and numerical relationships, giving birth to mathematical physics. In addition, this elevated music to one of the highest intellectual pursuits. Furthermore, since the "perfection of sounds" could now be revealed by numbers, all simple numeric ratios could be visualized as sounds. Kepler's "harmony of the spheres" is based on this, as well as harmonically resounding architecture. If the visible proportions of a building can be expressed in numeric ratios, then their relationships can be "heard" as chords. Like the "golden section" of architecture, musical harmony "imposes order in the hearts and minds of men by virtue of their simple, natural relationships" (Harnoncourt). This also helped support the baroque idea that music was a reflection of the divine order (unless you were a minstrel, perhaps).”

### The Harmonic Series

To introduce the harmonic series let’s look at a quote from Reginald Bain who provides a very succinct definition and description:

When musicians use the term *overtone series*, they are generally referring to a set of frequency components that appear above a musical tone. The related term *harmonic series *is a more precisely defined concept with applications in both music and mathematics. Though musicians sometimes use these terms interchangeably, the term harmonic series specifically refers to a series of numbers related by whole-number ratios. For example, the series of frequencies 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, etc., given in Hertz (Hz.), is a harmonic series; so is the series 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, etc. Notice that the difference in frequency between adjacent members of both series is constant, that is to say, the harmonics are equally- spaced. The lowest frequency component of such a series is called the *fundamental*. For example, the fundamental of the first series is 1000 Hz, and the fundamental of the second series is 500 Hz. The other (higher) frequency components are called overtones, harmonics or partials.

### Harmonics of an Open String

Let’s take a look at a chart of the first sixteen harmonics from the harmonic series. The Monochord used for demonstration has two bridges 100cm apart and has its’ 1^{st} harmonic and fundamental to C at vibrating at 130.8 hz. While striking or plucking the string to generate sound the fundamental pitch sounds as well as all the “harmonics”. These harmonics can’t always be heard distinctly but are all sounding together as the string vibrates.

We can isolate out these harmonics on a single string on the monochord by dividing the string in whole number divisions. The point where the division occurs is called a nodal point. If we take the finger from one hand and place it lightly at one of the nodal points and use our other hand to pluck the string we can hear the isolated harmonic.

**The First 16 Steps of the Harmonic Series**

Harmonic | Nodal Point | Frequency in Hertz |
---|---|---|

1 | Open | 130.8 |

2 | 50 | 261.66 |

3 | 33.33 | 392.4 |

4 | 25 | 532.2 |

5 | 20 | 654 |

6 | 16.66 | 784.8 |

7 | 14.28 | 915.6 |

8 | 12.5 | 1046.4 |

9 | 11.11 | 1177.2 |

10 | 10 | 1308 |

11 | 9.09 | 1438.8 |

12 | 8.33 | 1569.6 |

13 | 7.69 | 1700.4 |

14 | 7.14 | 1831.2 |

15 | 6.66 | 1962 |

16 | 6.25 | 2092.8 |

Let’s look into this a little more. When we go to the 2nd harmonic and pluck the string the frequency of the pitch doubles, if we then double that, to the 4^{th} harmonic it doubles again, again at the 8^{th} etc. So, in the above chart we have octaves at the 2^{nd}, 4^{th}, 8^{th}, and 16^{th} harmonics. Note how there are more “pitches” or nodes between each successive octave. If we look at the hertz values generated by the pitches in relationship to each other we will see that if we compare two nodal points to each other they will have the relationship of the nodal point. So, for example, the 2^{nd} harmonic to the 1^{st} harmonic is beating twice as fast. If we look at the third harmonic (392.4) we see that that is 3 times the 1^{st} harmonic (130.8*3= 392.4) and also 3/2 (1.5 times) faster than the 2^{nd} harmonic (261.6*1.5= 392.4).

With our new knowledge of how harmonics relate to each other we can examine how nodal points relate to musical intervals. Below is a chart that shows another view of the harmonic series generated by a string tuned to C at 130.8 hz. In addition to the Harmonic and Frequency from the last table we have three new columns. Column 2 shows the note generated by the harmonic. In column 3 we have the interval from the harmonic you are looking at and its’ relationship to the harmonic that is reduced down to a range of one octave. So for the 3^{rd} harmonic it has an interval of 3/2 since the 2^{nd} harmonic falls within the range of one octave, if we used 3/1 as the ratio this would be a compound ratio(octave plus the next harmonic) or interval (an octave plus a fifth). Next we reduuce the ratio using "octave reduction", reducing the ratio down to their lowest numbers, so if we take the octave of the 4th harmonic and the 6^{th} harmonic, this would be 6/4 (the sixth harmonic/the closest octave of the fundamental) but since 6/4 reduces down to 3/2 that is the ratio I’ve given. The 4^{th} column shows the musical interval of the ratio from the 3^{rd} column.

Harmonic | Note | Ratio Between Harmonic & Closest Octave |
Interval | Frequency in Hertz |
---|---|---|---|---|

1 | C | 1/1 | Unison | 130.8 |

2 | C | 2/1 | Octave | 261.6 |

3 | G | 3/2 | Perfect 5th | 392.4 |

4 | C | 2/1 | Octave | 523.2 |

5 | E | 5/4 | Major 3rd | 654 |

6 | G | 3/2 | Perfect 5th | 784.8 |

7 | Bb | 7/4 | Minor 7th | 915.6 |

8 | C | 2/1 | Octave | 1046.4 |

9 | D | 9/8 | Major 2nd | 1177.2 |

10 | E | 5/4 | Major 3rd | 1308 |

11 | F# | 11/8 | Rased 4th | 1438.8 |

12 | G | 3/2 | Perfect 5th | 1569.6 |

13 | A | 13/8 | Minor Sixth | 1700.4 |

14 | Bb | 7/4 | Minor 7th | 1831.2 |

15 | B | 15/8 | Major 7th | 1962 |

16 | C | 2/1 | Octave | 2092.8 |

Another way to look at the music intervals generated by the overtone series is to look at the relationship between two harmonics that are directly next to each other. The next chart takes the table we just looks at and shows the ratios of the two subsequent harmonics in column three and the interval they create in column 4. We’ll only go to the 10^{th} harmonic since at this point we are just getting too smaller and smaller “2nds”.

Harmonic | Note | Ratio BetweenAdjacent Harmonics |
Interval | Frequency in Hertz |
---|---|---|---|---|

1 | C | 1/1 | Unison | 130.8 |

2 | C | 2/1 | Octave | 261.6 |

3 | G | 3/2 | Perfect 5th | 392.4 |

4 | C | 4/3 | Perfect 4th | 523.2 |

5 | E | 5/4 | Major 3rd | 654 |

6 | G | 6/5 | Minor 3rd | 784.8 |

7 | Bb | 7/6 | Minor 3rd | 915.6 |

8 | C | 8/7 | Major 2nd | 1046.4 |

9 | D | 9/8 | Major 2nd | 1177.2 |

10 | E | 10/9 | Major Second | 1308 |

**Music Ratios, String Length & Inverse Proportion**

The fundamental frequency of a stretched string is inversely proportional to the length of the string, keeping the tension and the mass per unit length of the string constant (this is known as pythagoras law of string proportion and also Mersenne’s laws). ** **Using the 1^{st }and 2^{nd} harmonics as examples, a string length that was exactly half of another string (with the same thickness, amount of tension etc.) would be beating twice as fast as the string twice as long. The third harmonic which has a ratio relationship to the 2^{nd} harmonic of 3/2 would be 2/3 the length of the open string and would be beating 1.5 times as fast (3/2).

Let’s revisit our Major Scale that we looked at from basic Western Music Theory and show what the music ratios for this scale in a tuning system based on the harmonic series. Note columns 4 & 5. Column 4 shows the exact computations I used to find the position to put the bridge and column 5 shows the position isolated. Let’s use the ratio of 5/4 as an example, first the math and then the explanation. For this example our bridges on the string are 100cm apart making the string length 100cm.

4/5=.8

100-(.8*100)=20

100-80=20

I flipped the ratio to get it’s inverse, 4/5 and then did the division which gives me 4 divided by 5 which equals .8. I then multiplied that by 100 (string length) to get 80, this is how long the string needs to be. I then subtracted 80 from 100 to find the placement to put the bridge, 20. If I place the bridge at 20cm and then pluck to the right of it the pitch for 5/4 is sounded.

Interval | Note | Ratio | Inverse Proportion Computation |
Poistion in cm. | Herts/cycles per second |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Root | C | 1/1 | 8/9=.888888889 100-(.888888889*100)=11.11 |
0pen | 130.8 |

Major 2nd | D | 9/8 | 8/9=.888888889 100-(.888888889*100)=11.11 |
11.11 | 147.15 |

Major 3rd | E | 5/4 | 4/5=.8 100-(.8*100)=20 |
20 | 163.5 |

Perfect 4th | F | 4/3 | 3/4=.75 100-(.75*100)=25 |
25 | 174.4 |

Perfect 5th | G | 3/2 | 2/3=.6666 100-(.6666*100)-33.33 |
33.33 | 196.2 |

Major 6th | A | 5/3 | 3/5=.6 100-(.6*100)=40 |
40 | 218 |

Major 7th | B | 15/8 | 8/15=.533 100-(100*.533)=46.7 |
46.7 | 242.25 |

Octave | C | 2/1 | 1/2-=.5 100-(100*.5)=50 |
50 | 261.6 |

### Web Resources

http://in.music.sc.edu/fs/bain/atmi02/hs/index-noaudio.html#slmi

khanacademy.org

https://beta.observablehq.com/@mcmire/illustrating-harmony-with-the-harmonic-series

https://alexanderchen.github.io/harmonics/

http://teropa.info/blog/2016/09/20/additive-synthesis.html

https://mathemagicalmusic.weebly.com/